Ask Business Law & Ethics Expert

Question: In July 1985, Congress passed the Statue of Liberty- Ellis Island Commemorative Coin Act. The Act instructed the Secretary of the Treasury to mint and sell a stated number of coins. In November and December 1985, the U.S. Mint mailed advertising materials about the coins to people whose names were included on a list of previous customers/coin collectors. These materials described the various coins the issuance of which was authorized by the Act, and encouraged potential purchasers to forward early payment for commemorative coins. Payment could be made either by check, money order, or credit card. The Mint had not previously dealt with credit card sales and the processing of credit card orders. Directly above the space provided on this form for the customer's signature on the order form was the following: VERY IMPORTANT-PLEASE READ: YES, Please accept my order for the U.S. Liberty Coins I have indicated. I understand that all sales are final and not subject to refund. Verification of my order will be made by the Department of the Treasury, U.S. Mint. If my order is received by December 31, 1985, I will be entitled to purchase the coins at the Pre-Issue Discount price shown. I have read, understand and agree to the above. Please allow 6 to 8 weeks for delivery after issue date of January 1, 1986. The U.S. Mint reserves the right to limit quantities shipped, subject to availability. Mint may discontinue accepting orders should bullion prices increase significantly. Credit card orders will be billed upon receipt by the U.S. Mint. In November 1985, Mrs. Mesaros sent an order to the Mint for certain Statue of Liberty coins. She provided information about her husband's credit card, reflecting that $1,675 should be charged to Mr. Mesaros's credit card account. Later in November, Mr. Mesaros sent additional orders for another 18 gold coins to the Mint. These orders were placed in the names of members of the Mesaros family, and were paid for with nine separate checks. Demand for the coins far exceeded the Mint's expectations, and there were not enough five-dollar gold coins to fill all the orders of those who had responded to the Mint's promotional materials.

The last order for gold coins that was filled was accepted some time between December 31, 1985, and January 6, 1986. This exhausted the supply of the 500,000 gold coins that were authorized by the Act. These gold coins increased in value by approximately 200 percent within the first few months of 1986. In February 1986, the Mesaroses were informed by a form letter that the Mint "had tried but was unable" to process the Mesaroses' November credit card order. The Mesaroses did receive the 18 coins that had been paid for by checks. Investigation revealed that the Mesaroses' bank had given authorization to the Mellon Bank (responsible for processing credit card orders for the Mint) with respect to the coin order charged to Mr. Mesaros's account. However, the Mint and the Mellon Bank were swamped with a deluge of 756,000 orders, of which 186,000 were credit card orders. Cash orders were filled fairly promptly by the Mint, but credit card orders before being filled had to be sent by the Mint to the Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh for verification, investigation, and determination of validity, which was a slow process. Credit card orders, when approved by the Mellon Bank were certified as valid and returned to the Mint to be filled. Before all of the 186,000 credit card orders could be verified by the Mellon Bank and thereafter filled by the Mint, all of the gold coins had been sold by the Mint in filling cash orders, and no more coins were available. As a result, 13,000 credit card orders could not be filled, and were rejected by the Mint. The Mesaros order was in this rejected group. The Mesaroses brought suit against the government for breach of contract. They claimed that the Mint's promotional material and order form was an offer. Are they correct?

Business Law & Ethics, Finance

  • Category:- Business Law & Ethics
  • Reference No.:- M92466120
  • Price:- $15

Priced at Now at $15, Verified Solution

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Law & Ethics

Assignment -purpose - this significant task requires

Assignment - Purpose - This significant task requires forward planning and adequate time for research, reading and reflecting. The purpose of the assignment is to enable you to achieve outcomes in knowledge, skill and ap ...

Group report1 this group assignment consists of 2 parts

GROUP REPORT 1. This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part A is a case study on contract law, and Part B is a question involving Corporations Law. Both questions must be answered. 2. The total word limit for the gro ...

Managing the legal environment assignment - research

MANAGING THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT ASSIGNMENT - RESEARCH PROJECT Company: Nike (a) Summarise in about 250-500 words the characteristics/features of the organisation (you can choose a statutory/government body or select a bus ...

Corporations law - assignment questions -objectives -

CORPORATIONS LAW - ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS - Objectives - Answer the following questions with reference to the relevant statute law and general common law principles operating in Australia concerning the consequences of the ...

Business law assignment question -mabo has been said to a

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mabo has been said to a cornerstone of the Australian legal system. Your response must discuss the following: 1. Discussion of the Mabo (No 2) case. 2. Explain the impacts of the case o ...

Assignment - advanced financial accounting1 classification

Assignment - Advanced Financial Accounting 1. 'Classification of liabilities is based on the same principles as the classification of assets.' Do you agree with this? Why or why not? 2. 'Classification of liabilities as ...

Property law for business assignment question -mrs betty

PROPERTY LAW FOR BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mrs Betty Joyce lives in an old, war-time vintage army shed in Baldivis. When she started to live in the shed, in the early 1960s, the whole area was a remote backwater. Si ...

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law explain the

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law. Explain the purpose of the law of torts in contract to the purposes of criminal law. Why are they different? Support your answer using specific examples from the textbook.

Assessment taskassignment questiondiscussi the main ways

Assessment Task Assignment question: Discuss: i. the main ways that a company may source finance; and ii. the benefits and costs associated with the main sources of corporate finance. Guidance - Students are to read text ...

Australian commercial and corporations law assignment -this

Australian Commercial and Corporations Law Assignment - This assignment deals with critical problem solving skills. This assessment tests course objectives addressing: Knowledge of relevant law, Application of the law to ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As