Ask Business Law & Ethics Expert

Question: Ellefson and Mustaine are original members of the heavy metal rock band, Megadeth. The band was initially formed in 1983, with Mustaine as the lead guitarist, lead vocalist, and lead songwriter, and Ellefson as the band's bassist. In 1990, they formed a formal corporation, Megadeth, Inc., with Mustaine receiving 80 percent of the stock and Ellefson 20 percent. Years later, Ellefson claimed that Mustaine, Megadeth, Inc., and others ("the Megadeth defendants") had defrauded him out of his share of the corporation's profits. Beginning in October 2003, Ellefson and the Megadeth defendants entered into negotiations to settle their disputes. On April 16, Ellefson's attorney, Abdo, received an initial draft of a proposed "Settlement and General Release," whereby Ellefson's interest in the corporation and various other licensing/recording agreements would be purchased. Negotiations over this proposed settlement continued uneventfully over the next four weeks as the attorneys incorporated various comments and changes. The pace of negotiations accelerated in May, however, because Mustaine imposed a deadline of five o'clock on Friday, May 14, 2004, for completion of the settlement. To that end, the parties' attorneys began working in earnest to put together a final draft of the agreement by the end of the week. On the morning of Thursday, May 13, Abdo received an e-mail reminding him "that Dave Mustaine has instructed us to pull the offer to Ellefson off the table and to terminate this deal as of 5 PM PST on Friday 5/14/04, if we do not have a signed agreement in hand." The following day, Friday, May 15, attorneys for both sides worked to finalize a draft of the agreement in time to meet the five o'clock deadline. After an exchange of e-mails between the attorneys, Abdo e-mailed Lurie, the Megadeth defendants' lawyer, that he was faxing his final comments, and that Lurie should "make the changes and we are done."

At 4:45 PM PST, 15 minutes prior to expiration of the offer, Lurie sent Abdo a finalized copy of the agreement. In a covering document to the final agreement, Lurie stated that "attached is an execution copy of the above-referenced Settlement Agreement," reiterated the five o'clock deadline, and stated that defendants reserved "the right to make further changes pending our finalizing Exhibits A and B and the full execution of the agreement early next week." In the final e-mail of the day between the attorneys, sent on Friday, May 14, 2004, 5:16 PM, Abdo e-mailed Lurie and stated that "Dave Ellefson told me he signed and faxed the signature page to you. Thanks for the drafting work." Ellefson did sign and fax a completed signature page shortly after receiving the final agreement at 4:45 PM on Friday, but there was no evidence that the fax was sent prior to the 5 PM deadline. On Thursday, May 20, 2004, four business days after Ellefson's signature fax was received, the Megadeth defendants' attorney, Lurie, sent all the parties fully executed copies of the agreement by regular mail. On May 24, four days after Lurie had mailed the agreement and 10 days after Ellefson had faxed the signed signature page, Lurie received an e-mail from Abdo stating that Ellefson "withdraws from these negotiations and withdraws all proposals." In response to this e-mail, Lurie stated, "we are not certain what you are talking about, but, as you know, there is a signed settlement agreement in place, which Dave [Ellefson] faxed to us more than a week ago." Finally, nine days later, on June 2, 2004, Abdo received the finalized agreement that Lurie had mailed on May 20, 2004. Ellefson filed suit against the Megadeth defendants. The Megadeth defendants moved to enforce the settlement agreement and dismiss Ellefson's action, arguing that any and all disputes between the parties were resolved by an agreement entitled "Settlement and General Release" and signed by all of the parties. Are they correct?

Business Law & Ethics, Finance

  • Category:- Business Law & Ethics
  • Reference No.:- M92466095
  • Price:- $15

Priced at Now at $15, Verified Solution

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Law & Ethics

Assignment -purpose - this significant task requires

Assignment - Purpose - This significant task requires forward planning and adequate time for research, reading and reflecting. The purpose of the assignment is to enable you to achieve outcomes in knowledge, skill and ap ...

Group report1 this group assignment consists of 2 parts

GROUP REPORT 1. This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part A is a case study on contract law, and Part B is a question involving Corporations Law. Both questions must be answered. 2. The total word limit for the gro ...

Managing the legal environment assignment - research

MANAGING THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT ASSIGNMENT - RESEARCH PROJECT Company: Nike (a) Summarise in about 250-500 words the characteristics/features of the organisation (you can choose a statutory/government body or select a bus ...

Corporations law - assignment questions -objectives -

CORPORATIONS LAW - ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS - Objectives - Answer the following questions with reference to the relevant statute law and general common law principles operating in Australia concerning the consequences of the ...

Business law assignment question -mabo has been said to a

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mabo has been said to a cornerstone of the Australian legal system. Your response must discuss the following: 1. Discussion of the Mabo (No 2) case. 2. Explain the impacts of the case o ...

Assignment - advanced financial accounting1 classification

Assignment - Advanced Financial Accounting 1. 'Classification of liabilities is based on the same principles as the classification of assets.' Do you agree with this? Why or why not? 2. 'Classification of liabilities as ...

Property law for business assignment question -mrs betty

PROPERTY LAW FOR BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mrs Betty Joyce lives in an old, war-time vintage army shed in Baldivis. When she started to live in the shed, in the early 1960s, the whole area was a remote backwater. Si ...

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law explain the

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law. Explain the purpose of the law of torts in contract to the purposes of criminal law. Why are they different? Support your answer using specific examples from the textbook.

Assessment taskassignment questiondiscussi the main ways

Assessment Task Assignment question: Discuss: i. the main ways that a company may source finance; and ii. the benefits and costs associated with the main sources of corporate finance. Guidance - Students are to read text ...

Australian commercial and corporations law assignment -this

Australian Commercial and Corporations Law Assignment - This assignment deals with critical problem solving skills. This assessment tests course objectives addressing: Knowledge of relevant law, Application of the law to ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As