Please address the following fact pattern. Discuss any possible causes of action as well as relevant defenses. Only discuss relevant issues! The focus of this question is intentional torts so I would not worry about negligence. I am not as interested in your outcome (who will end up winning) as I am in how you use the law to support your points. Base your answer only on facts given. If additional information is needed, tell me that. Your answers should be about 200 words and is due on Thursday October 29. Respond in substantial form (at least 50 words per post) to at least three of your fellow students' postings by Sunday November 1.

Orlando, visiting California from New Jersey, was shopping at Save-Mart, a California corporation, when he was stopped by a security guard who accused him of stealing a bottle of Advil he had in his pocket. When the guard called the manager, Orlando explained he had previously bought the Advil at Rite-aid and was comparing prices. He said if they followed him to the drugstore, they would find the packaging from the bottle in the trash. He also said if they opened the bottle, they would find it was missing two pills, which Orlando said he took in the parking lot after departing the drugstore. The manager refused both requests and Orlando was unable to show a receipt, which he claimed, was also in the trash. He was taken to a stock room where he was handcuffed to a large metal container until police arrived. The manager filed a complaint against him, but charges were dropped when the security guard failed to appear to testify. Orlando then sued the store. For what?