PART A

In using the resources of the early Modules, your tribe discussed and developed a constitution. In the new constitution assume that there are rules protecting a member of the tribe from violent acts from another member of the tribe. Explain what rules protecting members of the tribe from such acts of violence were developed and why they were developed in the tribe's constitution. Be sure to refer to Hart's analysis of legal rules in the answer. There are additional resources on Moodle in the early Modules of the course to assist.

PART B Research Question

"A crime is an act or conduct which is prejudicial to the community. It renders the guilty person liable to punishment." Research a legal system of a foreign country and explain what penalties can be imposed by a court once a person is found guilty of a criminal offence. Then compare them to the range of penalties available to Australian courts in criminal cases. Be sure to refer to Hart's analysis of legal rules and use the requirements for Hart's 3 part legal system in the answer. There are additional resources on Moodle to assist in the early Modules of the course. Support your analysis with case and statute references where relevant.

PART C

In this part, your task is to research the Australian case, Gumland Property Holdings Ply ltd. V Duffy Bros Fruit Market ( Campbelltown) Pity Ltd (2008) 234 CLR 237 and report to your supervising partner (your boss!) on the significance of the case to business clients and the Australian law of contract. Initially Chapter 11 of the text can assist.

Please note that additional resources should and can be accessed in alternative textbooks on Business Law, Contracts' Law or Commercial Law.

Your answer should mention other cases in the analysis of the set case.

The report should use the MAC method as a structure- Issue, Rule. Application, Conclusion and remedies. This structure requires you to set out clearly and in an organised way these matters arising from the court's decision:

-Identify the common law legal issues in dispute. What were the broad areas of contract law that arc relevant here?

-Explain the principles of law, the rules that the court applied and which were relevant to deciding the issue. -Apply the relevant law to the facts. Explain how the court applied the relevant law.

-Conclusion and remedies- after the above stages how did the court reach a conclusion on the facts of the problem. Be sure to consider the remedy or remedies for the successful party.

PART D

In this part, your task is to select and research an Australian case relating to when a party to a contract may ask a court to cancel the contract due to fraudulent misrepresentation and report to your supervising partner (your boss!) on the significance of the case to the Australian law of contract. In the analysis you should discuss the issue of fraudulent misrepresentation both at common law and under consumer legislation. Parts of the text chapters on Consent of Parties (Chapter 7) and Consumer Protection (Chapter 17) can assist.

Contract law requires that parties enter agreements freely and voluntarily. Your choice must be an Australian case referred to in either the textbook or the Class Notes. Please note that some cases in the Class Notes are not in the textbook may be found in alternative textbooks on Business Law, Contracts' Law or Commercial Law.The report should use the 1RAC method as a structure- Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion and remedies. This structure requires you to set out clearly and in an organised way these matters arising from the court's decision:

-Identify the common law legal issues in dispute. What were the broad areas of contract law that are relevant here?

-Explain the principles of law, the rules that the court applied and which were relevant to deriding the issue. -Apply the relevant law to the facts. Explain how the court applied the relevant law.

-Conclusion and remedies- after the above stages how did the court reach a conclusion on the facts of the problem. Be sure to consider the remedy or remedies for the successful party.

PART E

Pedro and Lisa were both retailers selling imported French jewellery in Melbourne. Victoria. Lisa sold her business to Pedro and in the contract agreed that she would not carry on or be engaged in the sake of imported French jewellery anywhere in Australia for a period of two years. One year after selling the business Lisa established a new retail business in Cairns, Queensland, selling imported French jewellery. Can Pedro enforce the contractual promise against Lisa?

Advise Pedro using common law contract legal principles and the IRAC method as to what action Pedro can take and the possible remedies he could obtain. You do not need to discuss the essential elements and the formation of a contract topic here. Assume that a valid enforceable contract exists between the parties. Do not apply consumer law or other statute principles in your answer.

It is essential that you refer to relevant cases to support the analysis.

The IRAC method- Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion and remedies- requires you to set out clearly and in an organised way these matters:

- Identify the common law legal issues in dispute. What are the broad areas of contract law that are relevant here?

- Explain the principles of law, the rules, that apply and which are relevant to deciding the issue.

- Apply the relevant law to the facts. You may need to consider more than one approach here. There is not always one clear way.

- Conclusion and remedies- after the above stages reach a conclusion on the facts of the problem. Be sure to consider possible remedies for the innocent party.

Support your analysis with case and statute references where relevant.

Note: Refrencing style of:- "Australian Guide to Legal Citation 3rd ed"