Howard v. MacDonald Construction 71 Cal.App.4th 38(1998)

1.Who were the players in this project? Who sued who and for what?

2. As betweenlitacDonaid and the 'City, who won at the trial level? What contra_ct "theory" was used.?

3. Per the appeals court, why could MacDonald recover' "delay" damages when not allowed under the contract?

4. what was the "DSC" prsent in this case? What "type" of DSC was it?

5. what evidence at trial was necessary for MacDonald to prove "causation" and "damages?"

an assingment about reading a Case law and answering the questions attached, the answer should be short answers and dirct to the point.

I need two version of answer for two person .

use this website as a refrences and citation go to suprame court in california

http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/california.html