Ask Business Law & Ethics Expert

Class,

This case involves the concepts from chapter 4 and demonstrates that an organization's security is only as strong as its weakest employee:

Friday, May 13, 1988, will be remembered by a major Chicago bank. Embezzlers nearly escaped with $69 million! Armand Moore, who was released after serving four years of his eleven-year sentence for an $180,000 fraud, decided itwas time to put his fingers in something a little bigger and better. He instigated a $68.7 million fraud plan. Naming himself as "Chairman," he assembled Herschel Bailey, Otis Wilson, Neal Jackson, Leonard Strickland, and Ronald Carson to complete the formation of his "Board." Most importantly, the Board was able to convince an employee of the Chicago Bank to provide their "in." The caper required one month of planning in a small hotel in Chicago, and took all of 64 minutes to complete.

The bank employee had worked for the Chicago Bank for eight years, and he was employed in the bank's wire- transfer section, which dispatches multimillion-dollar sums around the world via computers and phone lines. Some of the bank's largest customers send funds from their accounts directly to creditors and suppliers. For electronic transfers, most banks require that a bank employee call back another executive at the customer's offices to reconfirm the order, using various code numbers. All such calls are automatically taped. The crooked employee participated in these deposits and confirmations, and he had access to all the code numbers and names of appropriate executives with whom to communicate.

The Board's targets were Merrill Lynch, United Airlines, and Brown-Forman distillers. A few members of the gang set up phony bank accounts in Vienna under the false names of Lord Investments, Walter Newman, and GTL Industries. At 8:30 a.m., a gang member posing as a Merrill Lynch executive called the bank to arrange a transfer of $24 million to the account of Lord Investments, and was assisted by one of the crooked employee's unsuspecting coworkers. In accordance with the bank's practice of confirming the transfers with a second executive of the company, the employee stepped in and called another supposed Merrill Lynch executive who was actually Bailey, his partner in crime. Bailey's unfaltering, convincing voice was recorded automatically on the tape machine, and the crooked employee wired the funds to Vienna via the New York City Bank. The same procedure followed at 9:02 and 9:34 a.m. with phony calls on behalf of United Airlines and Brown-Forman. The funds were initially sent to Citibank and Chase Manhattan Bank, respectively.

On Monday, May 16, the plot was uncovered. The Chairman and his Board were discovered due to no effort on the part of the Chicago Bank nor any investigative authority. Although bank leaders do not like to admit just how close the culprits came to getting away with it,investigators were amazed at how far the scheme proceeded before being exposed. Had the men been a little less greedy, say possibly $40 million, or if they had chosen accounts that were a little less active, they may have been touring the world today! The plot was discovered because the transfers overdrew the balances in two of the accounts, and when the companies were contacted to explain the NSF transactions, they knew nothing about the transfers.

So while the saying may be "dream big", Armand Moore probably now realizes that his dream was too big. Even just a fourth of the amount he was aiming for would have given him a comfortable life and potentially increased his chance of success.

How do you think this fraud could have been prevented? Why is the fraud that occurred here difficult to prevent?

Business Law & Ethics, Finance

  • Category:- Business Law & Ethics
  • Reference No.:- M91802870
  • Price:- $30

Priced at Now at $30, Verified Solution

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Law & Ethics

Assignment -purpose - this significant task requires

Assignment - Purpose - This significant task requires forward planning and adequate time for research, reading and reflecting. The purpose of the assignment is to enable you to achieve outcomes in knowledge, skill and ap ...

Group report1 this group assignment consists of 2 parts

GROUP REPORT 1. This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part A is a case study on contract law, and Part B is a question involving Corporations Law. Both questions must be answered. 2. The total word limit for the gro ...

Managing the legal environment assignment - research

MANAGING THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT ASSIGNMENT - RESEARCH PROJECT Company: Nike (a) Summarise in about 250-500 words the characteristics/features of the organisation (you can choose a statutory/government body or select a bus ...

Corporations law - assignment questions -objectives -

CORPORATIONS LAW - ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS - Objectives - Answer the following questions with reference to the relevant statute law and general common law principles operating in Australia concerning the consequences of the ...

Business law assignment question -mabo has been said to a

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mabo has been said to a cornerstone of the Australian legal system. Your response must discuss the following: 1. Discussion of the Mabo (No 2) case. 2. Explain the impacts of the case o ...

Assignment - advanced financial accounting1 classification

Assignment - Advanced Financial Accounting 1. 'Classification of liabilities is based on the same principles as the classification of assets.' Do you agree with this? Why or why not? 2. 'Classification of liabilities as ...

Property law for business assignment question -mrs betty

PROPERTY LAW FOR BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mrs Betty Joyce lives in an old, war-time vintage army shed in Baldivis. When she started to live in the shed, in the early 1960s, the whole area was a remote backwater. Si ...

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law explain the

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law. Explain the purpose of the law of torts in contract to the purposes of criminal law. Why are they different? Support your answer using specific examples from the textbook.

Assessment taskassignment questiondiscussi the main ways

Assessment Task Assignment question: Discuss: i. the main ways that a company may source finance; and ii. the benefits and costs associated with the main sources of corporate finance. Guidance - Students are to read text ...

Australian commercial and corporations law assignment -this

Australian Commercial and Corporations Law Assignment - This assignment deals with critical problem solving skills. This assessment tests course objectives addressing: Knowledge of relevant law, Application of the law to ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As