Below are bowling scores for several UMUC statistics professors. Based on output from ANOVA, who is the better bowler (for those of you who don't bowl, a numerically higher score indicates a better score)?
John Mark Kathy
157 180 156
148 175 158
150 165 145
140 195 151
160 185 166
167 170 161
Apart from the math, what is ANOVA going to tell us about these data? How is ANOVA going to "look at" the data? What does ANOVA want to know?
Simply talk about the Excel steps - what buttons get pushed, when?
Is anything missing? Pushing the same buttons in step 3, can you get the same output?