Assignment and Presentation: Business law

Word Limit: approximately 2000 Words.

The presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 8 slides, and three short points per slide.

Present two parts of the IRAC method (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome).

1. Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997)

presentation and visual slides

The oral presentations were clear and understandable;

The oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and

The presentation slides were logical and structured.

Written Assignment:

Identify the facts of the case

All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised. Some of the facts are clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The facts are not clearly or accurately outlined.

Written Assignment:

Explain the relevant law relating to the case All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed. Most of the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised. Some of the relevant law is clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The relevant law is not clearly or accurately outlined.

Written Assignment:

Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case

All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law.

All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed.

Most of legal arguments are clearly and accurately summarised.

Some of the legal arguments are clearly and accurately outlined in brief.

The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined.

Written Assignment:

Summarise the judgement of the case

The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. The decision of the judge is accurately detailed. The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format. The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief. The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.

Written Assignment:

Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent.