1. Name and expand on the ways in which an undercover operation would be different than most approaches that are routinely used to solve crimes. Why must it be a totally different kind of investigation?

2. The primary reason for using the investigative review technique in a criminal case is to ensure that nothing has been overlooked. Terrorism investigations are different from routine criminal matters. In a short essay, cover the following concepts:

a. define "normal" criminal violations. Compare "normal" criminal violations to "terrorist" criminal violations.

b. "If the case was initially approached from a criminal perspective, it is possible that terrorist suspects were never considered as perpetrators. Why or why not?

c. "How would you handle witnesses in a terrorist investigation that might have been interviewed 18 months or so previously?

3. Explain why the investigation of terrorism most benefits from undercover operatives and techniques that are not as successful in "normal" investigations.

Your paper should be 1 to 2 pages in length not including the title page and the references page. Citations, references, formatting should be in accordance with APA guidelines.