Ask Microeconomics Expert

problem 1: Suppose you are a regulator in charge of allocating water between residential and agricultural users (farmers) in Southern California. You conduct a survey that finds that under the current split the average residential water consumer would be willing to pay up to $0.70 a gallon for the next gallon of water they consume while the increased market value of crop production from the gallon of water (after farmers pay their costs) to the most profitable farmer would be $0.20. Is the current allocation of water economically efficient (circle: yes or no)? If not, in what direction should the water be reallocated? In a sentence or two describe how we would expect these two quantities to compare to each other if net benefits were maximized.

problem 2: You are tasked with evaluating a project for reducing nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) loading into the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). These nutrients make their way into the GOM by way of the Mississippi River and primarily come from the runoff of chemical fertilizer and animal manure from Midwestern farms. They can trigger hypoxia (look it up) in the marine ecosystem, leading to “dead zones”, unattractive and toxic algae blooms, and fish kills. A consultant for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) estimates the following “marginal benefit” curve to fishermen and other affected communities for reductions in nutrient loads from their baseline (2010) levels: MB = 10-.1Q. Q is in units of millions of tons of nitrogen removed (so 1=1,000,000 tons). MB is in millions of dollars per million tons (so 1 = $1,000,000).     

a) Draw the marginal benefit curve for nutrient cleanup given the equation above. describe why the downward slope of this curve is reasonable (hint: what does this imply for the extra damage done by each extra unit of pollution as it is released into the ecosystem?). Finally, describe why this is a “demand curve” for pollution abatement.   

b) Graphically, show how the total benefits of nitrogen removal can be find outd from the marginal benefit function at a reduction of 10 million tons (Q = 10). find out these total benefits numerically. 

c) Using the logic developed in the previous problem, come up with an equation that gives you total benefits. In other words, come up with an equation of the total area of the “rectangle” and “triangle” that make up total benefits for any level of Q. (Note that I showed how to do this in class for a specific ex. You should also be able to check your work by seeing if your equation can replicate your answer for part b.) Graph this equation (by hand or feel free to cut and paste from Excel or a similar graphic program). 

d) Intuitively, describe why total benefits increase at a decreasing rate as the level of pollution abatement increases.  

problem 3: This problem continues the analysis from problem 2.  
 
a) Another economic study finds that the marginal cost (MC) to farmers of nutrient runoff abatement is MC = .1Q. Graph this function & describe intuitively why it slopes upward in Q.

b) Following logic very similar to that in 2(c), find a formula for the total costs (TC) to farmers of a reduction in nutrient runoff.

c) Graph the total benefits and total costs functions on the same graph (again, feel free to cut and paste from Excel or a similar program). At approximately what level of abatement are net benefits to society (including both coastal and farming interests) maximized?

d) Graphically and numerically find the quantity of runoff abatement such that marginal benefits of reduced runoff are exactly offset by the marginal cost of the reduction (your graph should use the MB and MC functions, not the total functions). Why is this the efficient level of pollution abatement? 

e) Suppose the status quo is zero abatement. Who wins and loses from moving to the efficient amount of runoff found in part d and by how much? Is there the potential to create a “win-win” out of this situation? How?

problem 4: Consider the case of cleaning up chemical contamination at an industrial site. The marginal benefits of additional cleanup are decreasing as the amount of cleanup increases. However, the marginal costs of the cleanup are actually decreasing (rather than increasing) in the level of cleanup as well. The reason is that much of the cost of the cleanup involves first locating contamination and then digging to expose contaminated soil. Therefore, the most expensive unit to clean up is the very first.  We can depict this graphically. 

First, if you were only looking at whether the first small increment of cleanup passed a benefit-cost test, what would you conclude?

Second, does the “equimarginal principle” (MB = MC) lead to a situation where the net benefits of cleanup are maximized?  

Microeconomics, Economics

  • Category:- Microeconomics
  • Reference No.:- M91432

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Microeconomics

Question show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium

Question: Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the mode ...

Question recycling is a relatively inexpensive solution to

Question: Recycling is a relatively inexpensive solution to much of the environmental contamination from plastics, glass, and other waste materials. Is it a sound policy to make it mandatory for everybody to recycle? The ...

Question consider two ways of protecting elephants from

Question: Consider two ways of protecting elephants from poachers in African countries. In one approach, the government sets up enormous national parks that have sufficient habitat for elephants to thrive and forbids all ...

Question suppose you want to put a dollar value on the

Question: Suppose you want to put a dollar value on the external costs of carbon emissions from a power plant. What information or data would you obtain to measure the external [not social] cost? The response must be typ ...

Question in the tradeoff between economic output and

Question: In the tradeoff between economic output and environmental protection, what do the combinations on the protection possibility curve represent? The response must be typed, single spaced, must be in times new roma ...

Question consider the case of global environmental problems

Question: Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries ...

Question consider two approaches to reducing emissions of

Question: Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermin ...

Question the state of colorado requires oil and gas

Question: The state of Colorado requires oil and gas companies who use fracking techniques to return the land to its original condition after the oil and gas extractions. Table 12.9 shows the total cost and total benefit ...

Question suppose a city releases 16 million gallons of raw

Question: Suppose a city releases 16 million gallons of raw sewage into a nearby lake. Table shows the total costs of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits of doing so. (Benefits in ...

Question four firms called elm maple oak and cherry produce

Question: Four firms called Elm, Maple, Oak, and Cherry, produce wooden chairs. However, they also produce a great deal of garbage (a mixture of glue, varnish, sandpaper, and wood scraps). The first row of Table 12.6 sho ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As