Q. Robert Chuckrow Construction Company (Chuckrow) was employed as the general contractor to build a Kinney Shoe Store. Chuckrow emplyed Ralp Gough to perform the carpentry work on the store. The contract with Gough stipulated which he was to provide all labor, amterials, tools, equipment, scaffolding also other items necessary to complete the carpentry work. Goughs workers erected 38 trusses at the work site. The next day, 32 of the trusses fell off the building. The reason for the trusses having fallen was unexplained also evidence Demonstrateed which it was not due to Chuckrows fault or a deficiency in the building plans. Chuchrow told Gough which he would pay him to reerect which trusses also continue work. When the work was complete, Chuckrow paid Gough the original contract price but refutilized to pay him for the additional cost of reerecting the trusses. Gough sued Chuckrow for this expense. Can Gough recover?