Topic: Fraud Auditing
You may consider the selected topic in the context of a country other than Australia.
Your assignment should answer the following questions:
1. Provide a brief overview of the nature of the fraud auditing, ethical issue/s involved.
2. How does auditing promote common good?
3. Identify ethical issues, and evaluate those issues from multiple ethical perspectives. ( HinT: this is recommended to write as a literature review, it has to be critical thinking and analysis.
Please following the format below;
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Nature of the auditing issue
4. Audtiing and common good
5. Ethical Issues
6. Conclusion
|
Descriptors
|
HD
|
DI
|
CR
|
PA
|
NN
|
|
Development of arguments and use of evidence
|
Demonstrates
exceptionally insightful and interesting arguments. A comprehensive and highly-structured response to the task
Exceptional understanding and application of relevant ethical theories
|
Demonstrateshigh standard of insight and originality. Solid arguments with excellent support .
High level of understanding and application of relevant ethical theories
|
Demonstrates goodunderstanding of major concepts.
Arguments with reasonable support.
Good understanding and application of relevant ethical theories
|
Fair knowledge of the subject matter. Arguments with acceptable support
Some understanding and application of relevant ethical theories
|
Fails to address the question posed. Little or no support
Poor or no understanding and application of relevant ethical theories.
|
|
Critical thinking and analysis
|
Exceptional analytical and evaluative skills
|
Highly developed analytical and evaluative skills
|
Evidence of analytical
skills
|
Barely sufficient
evidence of analytical
skills
|
Little or no evidence of analytical skills
|
|
Use of evidence
|
Evidence of exceptional support
|
Evidence of excellent support
|
Evidence of good support
|
Evidence of reasonable support
|
Little or no support to arguments
|
|
Research
|
Evidence of extensive reading
|
Evidence of substantial reading
|
Evidence of adequate reading
|
Evidence of some background reading
|
Little or no evidence of background reading
|
|
Expression and structure of the paper
(Clarity, citations, tidiness, grammar, spelling, spacing, paragraphing, page formatting)
|
Exceptional expression and presentation
|
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation
|
Goodpresentation with some presentation errors
|
Satisfactory presentation with an acceptable level of presentation errors.
|
Unacceptable standards of presentation Many mistakes
Lack of proofreading
|