Ask Macroeconomics Expert

International Marketing

Read the case which follows and answer the questions at the end.

The air-conditioning was on in the hotel room, but Matthew Kwong could not stop sweating. Here he was on his first sales trip to the Middle East, about to lose a $2.7 million deal, and the public works minister's assistant had just asked for a payoff.

Matthew, in his mid-30s, was a salesperson for Certec Limited, a Canadian high technology firm that designed computerized traffic flow management systems for large cities. The modernizing Middle East was a potentially rich market for the company, and Matthew knew it would be a "feather in his cap" if he could secure this contract.

Certec had hired a local law firm to act as its agent, but Matthew decided to negotiate the final contract details directly with the ministry of public works. All the company's systems were custom-designed, and Matthew knew the government would be making its decision based as much on Certec's ability to provide personal attention as on price.

Matthew arrived in the capital late on a Wednesday afternoon and met with the ministry's technical advisors on Thursday. They were clearly impressed with the plans the company had presented months earlier. What few questions they had, Matthew was able to resolve with a few faxes from Certec's head office in Montréal.

Then came his final negotiating session with the minister's advisor, an immaculately dressed man about the same age as himself. Surprisingly, he showed little interest in discussing the contract. He and Matthew talked about everything else - flight times to London, Canadian winters, and so on - except price. Matthew was relieved when the advisor finally said, "Save your numbers for this evening. We'll talk business over dinner."

The dinner went flawlessly. The advisor negotiated only $75,000 off the contract price. In fact, after he learned that Matthew was an avid soccer fan, he seemed to show more enthusiasm for comparing notes on the players' performance in last World Cup.

The two spent the rest of the evening touring the city in a limousine and visiting illegal nightclubs. By 2:00 A.M. they were firmly cemented by the bonds of alcohol and their common interest in the game of soccer. Matthew was sure he had solidified the deal. However, just as the limousine pulled up to Matthew's hotel, the advisor turned to him, flashed his most charming smile, and said, "Oh, yes, I forgot to check, but you did include the normal commission for government personnel in your price, didn't you? The German and the Italian vendors did."

Alarm bells went off in Matthew's head. "Commission?" he thought, "what commission?" He told the advisor he would check and get back to him tomorrow.

After a sleepless night, Matthew telephoned Certec's local agent. The lawyer said simply, "It is pretty standard procedure. I think about $12,000 is right for a contract this size. You can channel it through our legal fee if you wish. That is what most of our clients do."

Matthew was really distressed - for many reasons. Of course, he felt foolish in the eyes of his agent, so Matthew's first reaction was one of embarrassment. As well, he was annoyed at himself for being so naïve. He reminded himself, though, that this was his first sales negotiation with government officials outside the boundaries of western industrialized countries. He shrugged his shoulders and concluded that he still had a lot to learn.

There were a several aspects of this situation that still concerned him, though. For one thing, he did not know his firm's position on paying this sort of "commission." He felt a bit of resentment that his sales manager had not briefed him more thoroughly prior to his departure for the Middle East. Matthew was aware that his firm did have a formal policy of refusing to participate in sales deals of this sort - but, then, many firms had similar policies and chose to ignore them, as necessary. This was quite standard among firms dealing with foreign government contracts despite the fact that the Canadian Parliament had ratified the OECD rules concerning bribery and corruption.

Matthew also reviewed his conversations with both his sales manager and the vice president of sales. He knew they both considered this particular sale as totally achievable and were counting on Matthew to close it. The words of the vice president rang in his ears: "Do whatever it takes, Matthew. This is a really important sale for us. Not only is it highly profitable by itself, but we expect it to open all sorts of doors for us in other countries in the Middle East."

Finally, Matthew had a twinge or two of moral anxiety. The whole thing just did not feel right. It seemed so unsavoury to just "nod and wink" and pass the money quietly to the lawyer.

Questions

1. Should he pay the "commission" and, if so, to whom? Explain your reasoning. If he pays, how should he handle the situation with the sales manager and the vice president of sales? In your answer, include a discussion of the arguments in favour of paying and the arguments in favour of not paying.

2. Regardless of how you answered Question 1, is there a way he can avoid paying and yet still manage to salvage the deal?

3. Briefly, what does the OECD stipulate about member nations' obligations regarding bribery and corruption? Since Canada has ratified the OECD guidelines, what are the implications for Canadian business people selling to foreign governments?

Macroeconomics, Economics

  • Category:- Macroeconomics
  • Reference No.:- M92043269
  • Price:- $25

Priced at Now at $25, Verified Solution

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Macroeconomics

Economics assignment -topic evaluation of macroeconomic

Economics Assignment - Topic: Evaluation of Macroeconomic performance of Australia and New Zealand. Task Details: Complete a research-based analysis and evaluation of the relative macroeconomic performance of Australia a ...

Introductory economics assignment -three problem-solving

Introductory Economics Assignment - Three Problem-Solving Questions. Question 1 - Australia and Canada have a free trade agreement in which, Australia exports beef to Canada. a. Draw a graph and use it to explain and ill ...

Question in an effort to move the economy out of a

Question: In an effort to move the economy out of a recession, the federal government would engage in expansionary economic policies. Respond to the following points in your paper on the actions the government would take ...

Question are shareholders residual claimants in a publicly

Question: Are shareholders residual claimants in a publicly traded corporation? Why or why not? In some industries, like hospitals, for-profit producers compete with nonprofit ones. Who is the residual claimant in a nonp ...

Discussion questionsquestion 1 what are the main reasons

Discussion Questions Question 1: What are the main reasons why Nigerians living in extreme poverty? Justify. ( 7) Question 2: Why GDP per capita wouldn't be an accurate measure of the welfare of the average Nigerian? Exp ...

Question according to the definition a perfectly

Question: According to the definition, a perfectly competitive firm cannot affect the market price by any changing only its own output. Producer No. 27 in problem 2 decides to experiment by producing only 8 units. a. Wha ...

Question jones is one of 100000 corn farmers in a perfectly

Question: Jones is one of 100,000 corn farmers in a perfectly competitive market. What will happen to the price she can charge if: a. The rental price on all farmland increases as urbanization turns increasing amounts of ...

Question good x is produced in a perfectly competitive

Question: Good X is produced in a perfectly competitive market using a single input, Y, which is itself also supplied by a perfectly competitive industry. If the government imposes a price ceiling on Y, what happens to t ...

Question pepsico produces both a cola and a major brand of

Question: PepsiCo produces both a cola and a major brand of potato chips. Coca-Cola produces only drinks. When might it make sense for PepsiCo to divest its potato chip operations? For Coca-Cola to begin manufacturing sn ...

Question again demand is qd 32 - 15p and supply is qs -20

Question: Again, demand is QD = 32 - 1.5P and supply is QS = -20 + 2.5P. Now, however, buyers and sellers have transaction costs of $2 and $3 per unit, respectively. Compare the equilibrium values with those you calculat ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As