Adam Smith and David Ricardo, even though they both believe that humans tend to act in their own self interest in general, have different end points in their vision about the economy-Smith claims we end, as Heilbroner puts it, in "Vahalla" while Ricardo claims we end a relatively dismal steady state. In your thought paper, explore why they reach these strikingly different conclusions. In doing so, your challenge is to see if you can identify the central reason they reach such strikingly different conclusions.