Ask Business Economics Expert

Read the following text and answer the problems below:

In matters of economic theory, Keynes was scarcely any clearer. His most famous work, "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money", published in 1936, is a difficult and confusing book. Keynes deliberately misrepresented the views of his opponents, crudely lumping their ideas together and calling them, mockingly, "classical" (ie, obsolete). That angered many of his peers--few of whom were the purblind scholastics of popular mythology. The resulting recriminations made clearheaded debate about the new theories nearly impossible. And since Keynes expounded the new ideas partly by contrasting them with a caricature of orthodox thinking (ie, with a theory that nobody actually believed), it made it harder to be sure what the new ideas were.

Keynes, you might say, therefore got what he deserved. His own theories were almost immediately reduced to a variety of competing caricatures. And avowed disciples, not critics, undertook this task.

The diagram on this page appears nowhere in the "General Theory", but is much the most familiar reduction of Keynesian thought. Anybody who has picked up an economics textbook since 1950 will recognize it. That this caricature takes the form of a diagram is no accident. The need to distil from the "General Theory" something that could be taught to one's students--few of whom could be expected to read or understand the great book itself--was paramount, especially for American academics. So, from the late 1940s, economists such as Paul Samuelson began to spread the Keynesian gospel in this form--the gospel according to the income-expenditure diagram.

The big problem in macroeconomics is whether and how long high unemployment might persist in an economy. Whatever else Keynes believed, he undoubtedly believed that high unemployment can linger indefinitely if left untreated. And the income-expenditure diagram can indeed portray such an "equilibrium". Those who require no convincing of this point can skip the next three paragraphs.

The chart plots aggregate income (ie, output) on the horizontal axis, and the components of aggregate expenditure (consumption, investment, government spending less taxes) on the vertical axis. For the economy to be in equilibrium, the diagram supposes, income must equal expenditure--which is true at all points on the line sloping up from the origin at 45deg.

The line D1 shows that consumption rises with income. (Investment is decided in some other way; for simplicity's sake, just add it on.) Even if income were zero, there would still be some consumption, paid for out of savings. So D1 crosses the vertical axis somewhere above the origin. Then, as income rises, consumption rises as well--but not one-for-one. This is again because of saving habits: out of every pound of extra income, people will spend, say, only 80p. So the line D1 slopes upwards at less than 45deg, crossing the 45deg line to give an equilibrium income of Y1.

In this "model" of the economy there is no reason to suppose that an income of Y1 will be high enough to sustain full employment. Suppose that the unemployment rate at Y1 is 10%. What could be done about that? The answer is simple: increase expenditure by means of fiscal policy. Lower taxes and/or higher public spending will push D1 up to D2. The new equilibrium would then be at Y2, where the unemployment rate is 5%. Note that the slopes of the lines depend entirely on the assumption about how much income is saved. Note also that, because of those slopes, a given change in public spending (the vertical distance between D1 and D2) will elicit a change in income (the horizontal distance between Y1 and Y2) that is bigger. This is the Keynesian "multiplier" at work. The greater the propensity to spend (ie, the steeper D1 and D2), the bigger the multiplier and the more powerful the effect of fiscal policy.

1.Include everything that is mentioned in these paragraphs in a diagram and describe it very carefully.

2. Elucidate how this model could give theoretical support to Obama's stimulus package of $1tr.

3. Describe the limitations of this model as an explanation of the effects of government expenditure on GDP.

 

Business Economics, Economics

  • Category:- Business Economics
  • Reference No.:- M921574

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Economics

Standards drive instruction therefore how do standards

Standards "drive instruction," therefore, how do standards influence curriculum planning?

Explain how the application of the pdca cycle can support a

Explain how the application of the PDCA cycle can support a competitive strategy of low cost leadership.

Ford motors expects a new hybrid-engine project to produce

Ford Motors expects a new? Hybrid-engine project to produce incremental cash flows of $ 95 million each year and expects these to grow at 4?% each year. The upfront project costs are? $900 million and? Ford's weighted av ...

A five-year bond with a yield of 11 continuously compounded

A five-year bond with a yield of 11% (continuously compounded) pays an 8% coupon at the end of each year. a) What is the bond's price? b) What is the bond's duration? c) Use the duration to calculate the effect on the bo ...

Image manufacturing is an electronics manufacturer and

IMAGE Manufacturing is an electronics manufacturer and retailer. Its main products are Ultrabook computers, PCs and calculators. The current price of the Ultrabook is $ 600, the PC is $700 and the calculator is $30. This ...

According to kulish what is about the design of the euro

According to Kulish, what is about the design of the euro currency that lessens its appeal compared to prior national currencies?

How has the value of the euro changed compared to other

How has the value of the Euro changed, compared to other countries, over the past 10 years (since the Great Recession began)?

In lecture we discussed why the production possibilities

In lecture we discussed why the production possibilities frontier (the boundary of the production possibilities set) is bowed 'outwards'. When might the production possibilities set be bowed 'inwards'? Give an example of ...

In 2013 gallup conducted a poll and found a 95 confidence

In 2013, Gallup conducted a poll and found a 95% confidence interval of the proportion of Americans who believe it is the government's responsibility for health care. Give the statistical interpretation. I do not underst ...

The standard deviation of the number of video game as

The standard deviation of the number of video game A's outcomes is 0.5479, while the standard deviation of the number of video game B's outcomes is 0.2498. Which game would you be likely to choose if you wanted players t ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As