Ask Accounting Basics Expert

Assignment Cases/Questions

Part A - AUSGeo vs U-Trains

AUSGeo Engineering Ltd (AUSGeo) is an Australian geological engineering company which provides consultancy and infrastructure services to several companies in the mining, transport and infrastructure sectors.

In July 2014 AUSGeo was engaged by Underground Trains Melbourne (U-Trains) to perform infrastructure assessments and coordinate the excavation works for the construction of part of the tunnel that would link Melbourne to Sydney. The contract between AUSGeo and U-Trains had an initial term of 8 years and an agreed value of $18,000,000 for the infrastructure assessment and $86,000,000 for the excavation and construction services. The infrastructure assessment was completed by January 2015, and in that same month AUSGeo invested $16,000,000 in a tunnel boring machine (TBM) which was 100% dedicated to the project.

In September 2016, an auditing procedure evidenced that U-Trains was under severe financial difficulties and as a consequence U-Trains' Board of Directors decided to restructure the business. As part of the restructuring process, in October 2016 U-Trains temporarily suspended all existing contracts until further notice, which caused the immediate interruption of the payments to AUSGeo.

As AUSGeo's TBM had already been underground, AUSGeo incurred $8,000,000 in order to resurface it so it could be used in other projects. Unfortunately, during the resurfacing operation part of the tunnel collapsed and damaged the TBM, causing AUSGeo to spend a further $5,000,000 having it repaired.

In March 2017 U-Trains decided to quit the construction of the Melbourne-Sydney tunnel and negotiated the cancellation of the contract with AUSGeo. While the contract was in force, AUSGeo had received from U-Trains a total amount of $30,000,000, being $18,000,000 for the infrastructure assessment services (which were already completed) and $12,000,000 as an initial payment for the construction of the tunnel.

According to the contract's termination clause, U-Trains had to pay AUSGeo an upfront cancellation fee of 10% of the contract's original value (i.e. $10,400,000) plus 10% of the residual value over a period of 5 years. U-Trains honoured the upfront termination payment and agreed to pay the future instalments accordingly, so the contract was terminated on 30 March 2017.

In May 2017 AUSGeo took U-Trains to Court seeking compensation for the damages caused to the TBM. On 20 August 2017 the Court ordered U-Trains to pay $25,000,000 in damages to AUSGeo.

Required: For the year ending 30 June 2017, advise AUSGeo on the assessability of the payments received from U-Trains, supporting your arguments with legislative references and application of case law. (Calculations not required).

Part B - Black Gold Resort

In 1984 AUSGeo purchased a 20-hectare block of land in northern Queensland for $100,000. The land included a deactivated gold mine which had been used by AUSGeo for geoscience research projects during approximately 10 years. The land was also located in a heritage protected site with good potential for tourism.

As AUSGeo had not conducted any research projects on the land since 1995, its Board of Directors made a decision to sell it. However, instead of selling the vacant mine which would require extensive environmental remediation, AUSGeo decided to take advantage of its expertise in geoscience to create a theme resort where visitors could enjoy exciting experiences involving geological experiments, mine-site tours and field trips. In order to fund this enterprise, AUSGeo obtained a $30 million loan from the Bank of Queensland, which was to be repaid in 5 years at commercial interest rates.

The development, which was named "Black Gold Resort", was constructed between 2014 and 2015 at a total cost of $32 million, and on 10 April 2017 it was sold to Parklands Leisure Group (which owns and runs a number of entertainment facilities in QLD, including theme parks and resorts) for a total of $45 million. At the time of sale, the land was valued at $800,000 and the improvements (being the resort hotel and related infrastructure such as access roads, geothermal pools, solar energy plant and water reservoir) were valued at $44,200,000 (building only, excluding depreciating assets).

Required: For the year ending 30 June 2017, advise AUSGeo on the tax consequences of the above transactions, supporting your arguments with legislative references and applying relevant case law. (Calculations not required).

Accounting Basics, Accounting

  • Category:- Accounting Basics
  • Reference No.:- M92258516

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Accounting Basics

Question what discoveries have you made in your research

Question: What discoveries have you made in your research and how does this information inform your ability to evaluate effective coaching and its impact on organizations? Consider these guiding questions: 1. What core c ...

Question requirement 1 read the article in below attachment

Question: Requirement: 1. Read the article in below attachment, and answer the questions in a paper format. Read below requirements before your writing! 2. Not to list the answers, and you should write as a paper format. ...

Question as a financial consultant you have contracted with

Question: As a financial consultant, you have contracted with Wheel Industries to evaluate their procedures involving the evaluation of long term investment opportunities. You have agreed to provide a detailed report ill ...

Question the following information is taken from the

Question: The following information is taken from the accrual accounting records of Kroger Sales Company: 1. During January, Kroger paid $9,150 for supplies to be used in sales to customers during the next 2 months (Febr ...

Assignment 1 lasa 2-capital budgeting techniquesas a

Assignment 1: LASA # 2-Capital Budgeting Techniques As a financial consultant, you have contracted with Wheel Industries to evaluate their procedures involving the evaluation of long term investment opportunities. You ha ...

Assignment 2 discussion questionthe finance department of a

Assignment 2: Discussion Question The finance department of a large corporation has evaluated a possible capital project using the NPV method, the Payback Method, and the IRR method. The analysts are puzzled, since the N ...

Question in this case you have been provided financial

Question: In this case, you have been provided financial information about the company in order to create a cash budget. Management is seeking advice or clarification on three main assumptions the company has been operat ...

Question 1what step in the accounting cycle do adjusting

Question: 1. What step in the accounting cycle do Adjusting Entries show up 2. How do these relate to the Accounting Worksheet? 3. Why are they completed at the end of each accounting period? The response must be typed, ...

Question is it important for non-accountants to understand

Question: Is it important for non-accountants to understand how to read financial statements? If you are not part of the accounting/finance function in a business what difference would it make? The response must be typed ...

Question refer to the hat rack cash flow statement 2002 in

Question: Refer to the Hat Rack Cash Flow Statement, 2002 in the text on page 17. Answer the following questions and submit to me via Canvas by the due date. 1. Cash flow from operations? 2. Cash flow from investing? 3. ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As