Ask Question, Ask an Expert

+61-413 786 465

info@mywordsolution.com

Ask Managerial Economics Expert

A promoter decides to rent an arena for concert. Arena seats 20,000. Rental fee is 10,000. (This is a fixed cost.) The arena owner gets concessions and parking and pays all other expenses related to concert. The promoter has properly estimated the demand for concert seats to be Q = 40,000 - 2000P, where Q is the quantity of seats and P is the price per seat. What is the profit maximising ticket price?

As the promoter's marginal costs are zero, promoter maximises profits by charging a ticket price which will maximise revenue. Total revenue equals price, P, times quantity. Total revenue is represented as a function of quantity, so we need to work with the inverse demand curve:

P (Q) = 20 - Q / 2000

This gives total revenue as a function of quantity, TR (Q) = P (Q) x Q, or

TR (Q) = 20Q - Q2 / 2000

Total revenue reaches its maximum value when marginal revenue is zero. Marginalrevenue is first derivative of total revenue function: MR (Q) =TR'(Q). So

MR (Q) = 20 - Q / 1000

Setting MR (Q) = 0 we get

0 = 20 - Q / 1000

Q = 20,000

Recall that price is a function of quantity sold (inverse demand curve. So to sell this quantity, ticket price should be

P (20000) = 20 - 20,000 / 2,000 = 10

It may appear more natural to view the decision as price setting instead of quantity setting. Normally, this isn't a more natural mathematical formulation of profit maximisation since costs are generally a function of quantity (not of price). In this specific illustration, though, the promoter's marginal costs are zero. This means the promoter maximises profits simply by charging a ticket price that would maximise revenue. In this specific case, we characterise total revenue as a function of price:

TR2 (P) = (40,000 - 2000P)P = 40,000P - 2000 (P) 2

Total revenue reaches its maximum value when marginal revenue is zero. Marginal revenue is the first derivative of the total revenue function. So

MR2 (P) = 40,000 - 4000P

Setting MR2 = 0 we get,

0 = 40,000 - 4000P

P = 10

Profit = TR2 (P) -TC

Profit = [40,000P - 2000(P) 2] - 10,000

Profit = [40,000(10) - 2000(10)2] - 10,000

Profit = 400,000 - 200,000 - 10,000

Profit = 190,000

What, if the promoter had charged 12 per ticket?

Q = 40,000 - 2000P.

Q = 40,000 - 2000(12)

Q = 40,000 - 24,000 = 16,000 (tickets sold)

Profits at 12:

Q = 16,000(12) = 192,000 - 10,000 = 182,000

Managerial Economics, Economics

  • Category:- Managerial Economics
  • Reference No.:- M9577035

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Managerial Economics

Geographic information systems gisassignment short paper

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Assignment: Short Paper: GIS In the early years of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology, mapping was largely limited to public works, and then in the 1990s and early 2000s, ...

Assignment - portfolio project for the final project you

Assignment - Portfolio Project For the final project, you will create a case study based on a company of your choice. The case study should include at least 5 of the concepts that we have discussed. The case study should ...

Topic - cost benefit analysis cba discussion benefits and

Topic - Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) Discussion: Benefits and Shortcomings of Cost Benefit Analysis As mentioned in the Weekly Introduction, cost benefit analysis is one of the most widely used of all public-sector manage ...

Queuing theory in the public sectordiscussion queuing

Queuing Theory in the Public Sector Discussion: Queuing Theory and Wait Times For this Discussion, you dive deeper into the topic of queuing. To prepare: Review the Learning Resources for the week as they relate to the t ...

Question read three 3 academically reviewed articles on

Question: Read three (3) academically reviewed articles on managerial economics and complete the following activities: (500 words) 1. Summarize all three (3) articles. Please use your own words. No copy-and-paste 2. Disc ...

Simulation and agent-based modeling schelling t c 1971

Simulation and Agent-Based Modeling Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143-186. Seminal Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Discussion: Agent-Based M ...

I have long thought subway made a monster mistake in their

I have long thought Subway made a MONSTER mistake in their "$5 footlong" campaign, that showed the whole country that they could sell footlong subs for just $5. I think this decreased the value of their brand, and made t ...

Discussion explore applications of pert and cpm in the

Discussion: Explore Applications of PERT and CPM in the Public or Non-Profit Organizations PERT is typically used to manage very large projects. In terms of scale, think weapons systems, the development of interstate tra ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As